Specifically, you’re giving Phoenix→Nate too many levels. It’s not a flat -25 to get even gold costs on each hero. I do really like the listing of multiple levels though, that’s an interesting way to show things for the output.Įdit: Though I see that in your formula it seems as though you do combine them multiplicatively, just not sure why you aren’t up top.Įdit 2: I assume you are using gold efficiency for the table? If so, you are overvaluing some of them. In reality, it should be switched to a product of those multipliers, giving you 62,100%. That is, in the calculation for Jim, it’s assumed that there is a crusader next to him, Natalie and Nate assume the other is in the party, Hermit assumes there are no crusaders in front of him, and Werewolf assumes he’s not next to any non-animal crusaders.Īs something you may want to fix, all DPS boosts are multiplicative, not additive. It should also be noted that all crusader abilities are assumed to be optimal. Green are the strongest, blue in the middle, and white the weakest. I added color gradients for easy reference. The values are normalized against the lowest-damage crusader (Panda in my case). The blue and green table shows normalized damage ratings for each hero at level increments that are roughly the same cost (e.g., getting Jim from level 675 to 700 costs about the same as getting Nate from 225 to 250).
#Crusaders of the lost idols best formation level 40 free
Feel free to copy the sheet and change the gear and enchantment percentages (light purple box) to your data to check out how your crusaders stack up against each other. I made a spreadsheet to calculate and give a nice visualization of who my most powerful crusaders are so I could make the best possible choice for the Lone Descent challenge.
0 kommentar(er)
